ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025
Intraoperative technologies to assess margin status during radical prostatectomy - a narrative review.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-printed model for resection of positive surgical margins in robot-assisted prostatectomy.BJU international · 2025Trial
- Aetiology of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a pathway approach.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Long-term oncologic consequences.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- An interpretable nomogram for positive surgical margin risk after laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-centre development and internal validation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Engineering NIR Probes to Enhance Affinity and Clinical Workflow Compatibility for Prostate Cancer Imaging.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Delphi consensus on ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- The cost-effectiveness of intraoperative margin assessment strategies during radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- The Nerve-Sparing Quality (NSQ) Score: A Novel Intraoperative Scoring System for Assessing Nerve-Sparing Quality During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy-A Concept and Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Fluorescence Guidance in Urologic Oncology: Current Status, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nerve-Sparing in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Advantages and Pitfalls of Current Strategies and Technologies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Assessment of Surgical Quality in Radical Prostatectomy: Review of Objective Intraoperative and Functional Evaluation Scales.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Back-table specimen scanning using gantry-free hybrid hSPECT/LiDAR imaging: a feasibility study during PSMA-radioguided surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Engineering NIR probes to enhance affinity and clinical workflow compatibility for prostate cancer imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Re: Ben-Max de Ruiter, Jan E. Freund, C. Dilara Savci-Heijink, et al. Prospective Analysis of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Assessment of the Resection Bed for Bladder Tumor. Eur Urol Open Sci 2025;71:57-62.European urology open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive surgical margin (PSM) is a frequent concern for surgeons performing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). PSM are recognized as risk factors for earlier biochemical recurrence and expose patients to adjuvant or salvage treatments such as external radiotherapy and hormonotherapy. Several strategies have been established to reduce PSM rate, while still allowing safe nerve-sparing surgery. Precise preoperative staging by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy is recommended to identify suspicious areas of extracapsular extension (ECE) that warrant special attention during dissection. However, even with optimal imaging, ECE can be missed, some cancers are not well defined or visible, and capsular incision during surgery remains an issue. Hence, intraoperative frozen section techniques, such as the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen section examination (NeuroSAFE) have been developed and lately widely disseminated. The NeuroSAFE technique reduces PSM rate while allowing higher rate of nerve-sparing surgery. However, its use is limited to high volume or expert center because of its high barrier-to-entry in terms of logistics, human resources and expertise, as well as cost. Also, NeuroSAFE is a time-consuming process, even in expert hands. To address these issues, several technologies have been developed for an ex vivo and in vivo use. Ex vivo technology such as fluorescent confocal microscopy and intraoperative PET-CT require the extraction of the specimen for preparation, and digital images acquisition. In vivo technology, such as augmented reality based on mpMRI images and PSMA-fluorescent guided surgery have the advantage to provide an intracorporeal analysis of the completeness of the resection. The current manuscript provides a narrative review of established techniques, and details several new and promising techniques for intraoperative PSM assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.