Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39025903›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development of a machine learning approach for prediction of red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing Cesarean section at a single institution.

Sang-Wook Lee, Bumwoo Park, Jimung Seo, Sangho Lee, Ji-Hoon Sim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sang-Wook Lee *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Pungnap 2(i)-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Bumwoo Park *Big Data Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Jimung SeoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangho LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hoon SimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Pungnap 2(i)-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. jihoon_sim@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HR21C0198National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2022-00165755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in surgical techniques and perinatal management in obstetrics for reducing intraoperative bleeding, blood transfusion may occur during a cesarean section (CS). This study aims to identify machine learning models with an optimal diagnostic performance for intraoperative transfusion prediction in parturients undergoing a CS. Additionally, to address model performance degradation due to data imbalance, this study further investigated the variation in predictive model performance depending on the ratio of event to non-event data (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4 model datasets and raw data).The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) were evaluated to compare the predictive accuracy of different machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, K-nearest neighbor, decision tree, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, random forest, and deep neural network. We compared the predictive performance of eight prediction algorithms that were applied to five types of datasets. The intraoperative transfusion in maternal CS was 7.2% (1020/14,254). XGBoost showed the highest AUROC (0.8257) and AUPRC (0.4825) among the models. The most significant predictors for transfusion in maternal CS as per machine learning models were placenta previa totalis, haemoglobin, placenta previa partialis, and platelets. In all eight prediction algorithms, the change in predictive performance based on the AUROC and AUPRC according to the resampling ratio was insignificant. The XGBoost algorithm exhibited optimal performance for predicting intraoperative transfusion. Data balancing techniques employed to alter the event data composition ratio of the training data failed to improve the performance of the prediction model.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionErythrocyte TransfusionMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansPregnancyROC CurveCesarean sectionDataImbalanceMachine learningPredictionTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID39025903
PMCPMC11258332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.