Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39025898›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Establishing a model composed of immune-related gene-modules to predict tumor immunotherapy response.

Deqiang Fu, Xiaoyuan Weng, Yunxia Su, Binhuang Hong, Aiyue Zhao, Jianqing Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deqiang Fu *Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaoyuan Weng *Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Yunxia SuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Binhuang HongDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Aiyue ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China. fjhuishi140@163.com.
Jianqing LinThyroid and Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China. ljq_article_1390@163.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J01217Quanzhou City Science and Technology Program 2021N152sThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University BS202111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, tumor immunotherapy has been widely applied to treat various cancers. However, the accuracy of predicting treatment efficacy has not yet achieved a significant breakthrough. This study aimed to construct a prediction model based on the modified WGCNA algorithm to precisely judge the anti-tumor immune response. First, we used a murine colon cancer model to screen corresponding DEGs according to different groups. GSEA was used to analyze the potential mechanisms of the immune-related DEGs (irDEGs) in each group. Subsequently, the intersection of the irDEGs in every group was acquired, and 7 gene-modules were mapped. Finally, 4 gene-modules including cogenes, antiPD-1 immu-genes, chemo immu-genes and comb immu-genes, were selected for subsequent study. Furthermore, a clinical dataset of gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy was enrolled, and the irDEGs were identified. A total of 34 vital irDEGs were obtained from the intersections of the vital irDEGs and the four gene-modules. Next, the vital irDEGs were analyzed by the modified WGCNA algorithm, and the correlation coefficients between the 4 gene-modules and the response status to immunotherapy were calculated. Thus, a prediction model based on correlation coefficients was built, and the corresponding model scores were acquired. The AUC calculated according to the model score was 0.727, which was non-inferior to that of the ESTIMATE score and the TIDE score. Meanwhile, the AUC calculated according to the classification of the model scores was 0.705, which was non-inferior to that of the ESTIMATE classification and the TIDE classification. The prediction accuracy of the model was validated in clinical datasets of other cancers.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAlgorithmsAnimalsColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39025898
PMCPMC11258235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.