ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia2024
Right Ventricular Pressure Waveform Analysis-Clinical Relevance and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a Digital Twin of the Cardiopulmonary System in a Mouse: Inferring Hemodynamics from Sparse Measurements.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Central Venous Pressure Revisited: Physiology, Pitfalls, Misconceptions, and Modern Clinical Interpretation in Critical Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic monitoring: basic principles in operation room and intensive care unit.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Echocardiographic correlates of pressure-volume-derived indices: Advancing intraoperative assessment of right ventricular function.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- 3D echo derived right ventricular principal surface strain in pulmonary arterial hypertension.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous measurement of pressure in the right atrium and pulmonary artery has commonly been used to monitor right ventricular function in critically ill and surgical patients. This approach is largely based upon the assumption that right atrial and pulmonary arterial pressures provide accurate surrogates for diastolic filling and peak right ventricular pressures, respectively. However, due to both technical and physiologic factors, this assumption is not always true. Accordingly, recent studies have begun to emphasize the potential clinical value of also measuring right ventricular pressure at the bedside. This has highlighted both past and emerging research demonstrating the utility of analyzing not only the amplitude of right ventricular pressure but also the shape of the pressure waveform. This brief review summarizes data demonstrating that combining conventional measurements of right ventricular pressure with variables derived from waveform shape allows for more comprehensive and ideally continuous bedside assessment of right ventricular function, particularly when combined with stroke volume measurement or 3D echocardiography, and discusses the potential use of right ventricular pressure analysis in computational models for evaluating cardiac function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.