Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39025674›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

High-Precision Optical Fiber-Based Lickometer.

Artur Silva, Paulo Carriço, Ana B Fernandes, Tatiana Saraiva, Albino J Oliveira-Maia, Joaquim Alves da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Artur SilvaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Paulo CarriçoChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana B FernandesChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Tatiana SaraivaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Albino J Oliveira-MaiaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Joaquim Alves da SilvaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal joaquim.silva@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-3603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying and analyzing licking behavior can offer valuable insights into fundamental neurobiological mechanisms controlling animal consummatory behaviors. Lickometers are typically based on electrical properties, a strategy that comes with limitations, including susceptibility to electrical interference and generation of electrical disturbances in electrophysiological measurements. While optical lickometers offer an alternative method to measure licks and quantify fluid intake in animals, they are prone to false readings and susceptibility to outside light sources. To overcome this problem, we propose a low-cost open-source lickometer that combines a restricted infrared beam defined by optical fibers, with a poke design that allows easy access to the tongue while limiting access of other body parts and external light sources. This device also includes features for detecting nose pokes and presenting visual cues during behavioral tasks. We provide validation experiments that demonstrate the optical lickometer's reliability, high-sensitivity and precision, and its application in a behavioral task, showcasing the potential of this tool to study lick microstructure in combination with other techniques, such as imaging of neural activity, in freely moving mice.

Indexed as

Optical FibersAnimalsDrinking BehaviorEquipment DesignFiber Optic TechnologyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReproducibility of Resultsconsummatory behaviorlick microstructurelickometeropen sourceoptical

Identifiers

PMID39025674
PMCPMC11258538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.