ArticleUrology2024
Initial Antimicrobial Testing of a Novel Reusable Intermittent Urinary Catheter System and Catheter Reprocessing Device.
Article in Urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CAUTIon - not all UTIs are the same.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of the Aurie System, a preclinical prototype allowing for standardized intermittent catheter (IC) reuse of novel reusable no-touch ICs. Individuals with neurogenic bladder often require single-use ICs to urinate, but urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common cause of morbidity for IC users. Safer no-touch catheters are not easily affordable, and the Aurie System attempts to provide no-touch catheters at a fraction of the price by allowing for standardized and safe IC reuse.
methodsStandard ICs were inoculated with Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and incubated for 48 hours to assess microbial burden and biofilm formation (the latter using infrared fluorescence imaging). This procedure was repeated with Aurie ICs, focusing on evaluating catheter microbial burden after inoculation and reprocessing with the prototype washer-disinfector. This was repeated with up to 100 cycles to evaluate repetitive use.
resultsStandard ICs showed bacterial attachment and biofilm development peaking at 24 hours of incubation. The Aurie catheters produced a similar outcome but, after reprocessing, microbial burden was reduced below the level of detection. Repeat cycles showed pathogen clearance to similar levels. One catheter reached 100 cycles and there was no viable pathogen load after reprocessing.
conclusionIntermittent urinary catheters, when cleaned inappropriately, can harbor viable bacteria and biofilm. The Aurie System, when used to disinfect novel reusable ICs within a prototype reprocessing device, can reduce microbial burden below level of detection even after 100 cycles. This suggests the Aurie System may be a feasible technology for safe IC reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.