Trial reportBlood advances2024
Blood biodistribution and vector shedding of valoctocogene roxaparvovec in people with severe hemophilia A.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03370913 (A Phase 3 Open-Label, Single-Arm Study To Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of BMN 270, an Adeno-Associated Virus Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of Human Factor VIII in Hemophilia A Patients With Residual FVIII Levels ≤ 1 IU/dL Receiving Prophylactic FVIII Infusions), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Single-Arm Study To Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of BMN 270, an Adeno-Associated Virus Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of Human Factor VIII in Hemophilia A Patients With Residual FVIII Levels ≤ 1 IU/dL Receiving Prophylactic FVIII Infusions
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes 6 years after fidanacogene elaparvovec in adults with hemophilia B.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Clinical pharmacology insights from recent cell and gene therapy approvals relevant to pediatrics.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Roctavian gene therapy for hemophilia A.Blood advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractFollowing systemically administered adeno-associated virus gene therapy, vector particles are widely distributed, raising concerns about horizontal or germline vector transmission. Characterization of biodistribution and kinetics of vector DNA in body fluids can address these concerns and provide insights into vector behavior in accessible samples. We investigated biodistribution and vector shedding profile of valoctocogene roxaparvovec in men with severe hemophilia A enrolled in the phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial. Participants (n = 134) received a single 6 × 1013 vector genome (vg)/kg infusion and were assessed over 3 years. Vector DNA was measured using 4 different assays. Total vector DNA was evaluated in blood, saliva, stool, semen, and urine by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Encapsidated vector DNA was measured in plasma and semen with immunocapture-based qPCR. Contiguity of vgs and assembly of inverted terminal repeat fusions were measured in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using multicolor digital PCR. Median peak vector DNA levels observed 1 to 8 days after dosing were highest in blood, followed by saliva, semen, stool, and urine. Concentrations declined steadily. Encapsidated vector DNA cleared faster than total vector DNA, achieving clearance by ≤12 weeks in plasma and semen. Predominant vector genome forms transitioned from noncontiguous to full-length over time in whole blood and PBMCs, indicating formation of stable circularized episomes within nucleated cells. The replication-incompetent nature of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, coupled with steady clearance of total and encapsidated vector DNA from shedding matrices, indicates transmission risk is low. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03370913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.