Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39024302›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Youth engagement and social innovation in health in low-and-middle-income countries: Analysis of a global youth crowdsourcing open call.

Rayner Kay Jin Tan, Wenjie Shan, Eleanor Hummel, Joseph Deji, Yusuf Babatunde, Ronald Mirondo Waiswa, Ying Zhang, Yusha Tao, Weiming Tang, Meredith Del Pilar-Labarda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rayner Kay Jin TanUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-3368
Wenjie ShanUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-4805
Eleanor HummelUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Joseph DejiPioneer Medical Initiative, Akure, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4986-597X
Yusuf BabatundeFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-8233
Ronald Mirondo WaiswaVillage Based Rehabilitation Program, Uganda.
Ying ZhangFaculty of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-5691
Yusha TaoUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Meredith Del Pilar-LabardaDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila-School of Health Sciences, Palo, Leyte, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6563-3042
Beatrice HalpaapUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph D TuckerInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social innovation in health is a ground-up, community-engaged process that draws on the diverse strengths of local individuals to drive social change and health improvement. Social innovation may be particularly useful in low and middle-income countries to ensure effective and sustainable health solutions. The purpose of this study is to describe the findings of a global youth (18-35 years old) crowdsourcing open call on social innovations, and to identify the levels of engagement in such innovations. We organized a global crowdsourcing open call (Go Youth!) to identify and recognize youth social innovations in health and adopted both quantitative and qualitative approaches to analyze our data. For quantitative analyses, we described the socio-demographic characteristics of youth who submitted innovations. For qualitative analyses, we adopted a deductive-inductive analytic approach utilizing an adapted Hart's Ladder as a conceptual framework for our thematic analysis of participants' submissions, which comprised four levels of youth engagement: none, minimal, moderate, and substantial. The open call received 99 eligible submissions. Most participants were 23 years of age or older (90.7%), resided in LMICs (98.0%), male (64.3%), and had a bachelor's or higher degree (72.4%). Most of the submissions were written in English (93.9%), located in Africa (69.7%), and had prior implementation (60.2%). A total of 39 innovations had substantial youth engagement and qualitative data suggested that youth leadership and peer mentorship of other youth in the community were important aspects of engagement. LMIC youth developed and implemented social innovations that had evidence of impact or effectiveness in their communities, illustrating how social innovation approaches may be feasible in LMICs. More efforts should be made to identify and empower youth in these settings to spark change.

Identifiers

PMID39024302
PMCPMC11257312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.