Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39024294›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Teaching methods for critical thinking in health education of children up to high school: A scoping review.

Anna Prokop-Dorner, Aleksandra Piłat-Kobla, Magdalena Ślusarczyk, Maria Świątkiewicz-Mośny, Natalia Ożegalska-Łukasik, Aleksandra Potysz-Rzyman, Marianna Zarychta, Albert Juszczyk, Dominika Kondyjowska, Agnieszka Magiera and 7 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Anna Prokop-DornerDepartment of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-469X
Aleksandra Piłat-KoblaDepartment of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Magdalena ŚlusarczykInstitute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Maria Świątkiewicz-MośnyInstitute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6797-5580
Natalia Ożegalska-ŁukasikInstitute of Intercultural Studies, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4239-4429
Aleksandra Potysz-RzymanLIGHT Project, Institute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Marianna ZarychtaLIGHT Project, Institute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-3956-0316
Albert JuszczykMedical Faculty Student's Research Group for Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Dominika KondyjowskaMedical Faculty Student's Research Group for Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Agnieszka MagieraDepartment of Epidemiology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Małgorzata MarajDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Dawid StormanDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Sylwia WarzechaDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Paulina WęglarzDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Magdalena Wojtaszek-GłówkaMedical Faculty Student's Research Group for Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Wioletta ŻabickaMedical Faculty Student's Research Group for Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Małgorzata M BałaChair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-7264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization, the improvement of people's health literacy is one of the fundamental public health challenges in the 21st century. The key issue in teaching health literacy is to develop critical thinking skills. As health literacy and critical thinking should be developed at school age, we reviewed teaching methods or educational interventions used in empirical studies focused on the development of critical thinking regarding health and implemented by teachers in preschools, primary schools, or secondary schools. We searched seven databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ERIC, ProqQuest, PsycArticles, and CINAHL) from inception to 20 September 2023 for any type of empirical studies. Due to the heterogeneity in interventions and inadequate reporting of results, a descriptive synthesis of studies was performed in addition to quantitative analysis. Of the 15919 initial records, 115 studies were included in the review. Most of the educational interventions focused on lifestyle-related health issues such as substance use, sexual and reproductive health, and nutrition. The popularity of health issues changed over time and depended on the geographical context. Six dimensions that differentiated the teaching methods were identified: central teaching component, central educator, pupils' activity level, teaching context, educational materials, and significance of critical thinking. Many educational interventions did not address the development of critical thinking skills in a comprehensive manner, and the significance of critical thinking varied greatly. Interventions in which critical thinking had high and very high significance applied mainly problem-solving methods and involved pupils' activity. The evidence on the effectiveness of the teaching methods that develop critical thinking is limited because most articles failed to provide detailed information on the teaching methods or did not examine their effects. We recommend that a checklist is developed to facilitate a detailed description of health educational interventions and thus promoting their replicability. Study registration: The protocol of the review was registered in the OSF Registries on 13 January 2022 (doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46TEZ).

Indexed as

Health EducationSchoolsTeachingThinkingAdolescentChildHealth LiteracyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39024294
PMCPMC11257347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.