ArticlePloS one2024
Comparative study of Eimeria tenella development in different cell culture systems.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel organoids andParasitology · 2025Review
- Cultivating the endogenous life cycle ofParasitology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell culture systems have long been recognised as great resources to mitigate the use of animals in research, offering effective solutions for replacement or reduction with benefits commonly including lower costs, shorter duration and improved reproducibility. The use of in vitro culture methods has been extensively explored for many apicomplexan parasites, supporting significant research advances, but studies with Eimeria are often limited since they still depend on the animal host. In this study we have used 2.5D and 3D culture systems for the first time to evaluate the growth of Eimeria tenella parasites using a panel of cell lines (MDBK, HD11, COLO-680N and HCC4006). Results were compared to growth in 2D monolayers following established protocols. Observations using the fluorescent transgenic strain Et-dYFP showed invasion and development of parasites inside cells suspended in a collagen matrix (2.5D or 3D), supporting the development of asexual stages with the release of first-generation merozoites. Similar findings were observed when Scaffold-free 3D cell spheroids of HD11 cells were infected with sporozoites. No subsequent developmental stages were identified while evaluating these cell lines and further work will be required to improve in vitro culture systems to a point where reduction and replacement of animal use becomes routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.