ArticlePloS one2024
Experimental development of lightweight manipulators with improved design cycle time that leverages off-the-shelf robotic arm components.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing market for lightweight robots inspires new use-cases, such as collaborative manipulators for human-centered automation. However, widespread adoption faces obstacles due to high R&D costs and longer design cycles, although rapid advances in mechatronic engineering have effectively narrowed the design space to affordable robot components, turning the development of lightweight robots into a component selection and integration challenge. Recognizing this transformation, we demonstrate a practical framework for designing lightweight industrial manipulators using a case-study of indigenously developed 5 Degrees-of-Freedom (DOF) cobot prototype. Our framework incorporates off-the-shelf sensors, actuators, gears, and links for Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA), along with complete virtual prototyping. The design cycle time is reduced by approximately 40% at the cost of cobot real-time performance deviating within 2.5% of the target metric. Our physical prototype, having repeatability of 0.05mm calculated as per the procedure defined in ISO 9283:1998, validates the cost-effective nature of the framework for creating lightweight manipulators, benefiting robotic startups, R&D organizations, and educational institutes without access to expensive in-house fabrication setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.