Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39024237›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A mixed-methods study to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of delivering the optimal health program (OHP) for youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis: A study protocol.

Muhammad Omair Husain, Lisa D Hawke, Yun Lu, Nicole Kozloff, Gillian Strudwick, Michael Kiang, Wei Wang, David Castle, George Foussias

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05757128 (Optimizing Mental Health for Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05757128 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Mental Health for Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsPsychosis, Psychosocial FunctioningArmsOptimal Health Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Omair HusainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8575-3364
Lisa D HawkeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yun LuCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-6504-4052
Nicole KozloffDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-1351
Gillian StrudwickCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael KiangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wei WangCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David CastleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
George FoussiasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis experience significant distress, impaired general functioning and a high lifetime risk of self-harm and attempted suicide. The CHR period is an important phase in an individual's mental health where appropriate interventions may reduce the risk of progression to several negative outcomes, including the development of schizophrenia. Given that up to 80% of individuals with CHR have another diagnosable mental illness and almost half experience poor psychosocial functioning, developing interventions that address psychosocial functioning in young people with CHR is of great importance. This mixed-methods study aims to employ qualitative and quantitative methods to adapt an evidence-based comprehensive psychosocial and mental health self-efficacy program, the Optimal Health Program (OHP), and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary clinical efficacy in young people with CHR. We aim to recruit 30 CHR participants (age 16-29 years) in a single-arm 12-week exploratory clinical trial. Feasibility metrics will include recruitment, retention, and data completion rates. Acceptability will be informed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Clinical assessments (psychosis spectrum symptoms, depression, and anxiety), functional measures, and cognitive outcomes will be completed at study entry and repeated post-intervention at 12-weeks. We will run pre-post test data analysis to examine changes following engagement in the OHP intervention. Qualitative interviews will be conducted post-intervention to further evaluate the acceptability of the intervention and the trial design, and will be analyzed using thematic analysis. OHP may enhance the long-term mental health, well-being and functioning of CHR youth. However, the intervention must first be adapted to a CHR population; then, the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of delivering an intervention tailored around the varied needs of the CHR group must be established before a larger-scale appropriately powered study is pursued. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757128.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39024237
PMCPMC11257342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.