ArticlePloS one2024
Identification of key genes associated with acute myocardial infarction using WGCNA and two-sample mendelian randomization study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription Factor SP1 Drives Myocardial Ischemia/reperfusion Injury By Transcription Activation-mediated GADD45G Upregulation.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Integrating genomics and transcriptomics reveals candidate genes affecting loin muscle area in Huaxi cattle.PloS one · 2025Article
- Identification of hub genes in myocardial infarction by bioinformatics and machine learning: insights into inflammation and immune regulation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Validation of Biomarkers and Immunotherapy With Crohn's Disease Using WGCNA and Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of aging-related genes and immune infiltration landscape in ischemic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a severe condition with high morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to identify hub genes potentially associated with AMI and assess their clinical utility in predicting AMI occurrence.
methodsGene microarray data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were conducted on samples from patients with AMI and control samples to identify modules significantly associated with AMI. GO and KEGG analyses were applied to investigate the potential functions of these hub genes. Lastly, the mendelian randomization (MR) method was applied to analyze the causal relationship between the hub gene TNF and AMI.
results285 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through WCGNA and were clustered into 6 modules. The yellow module appeared most relevant to AMI. Further exploration through GO and KEGG pathway enrichment showed that key hub genes in the yellow module were linked to positive regulation of cytokine production, cytokine receptor binding, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway. The top 10 genes identified through Cytoscape software analysis were IL1B, TNF, TLR4, TLR2, FCGR3B, MMP9, CXCL8, TLR8, ICAM1, and JUK. Utilizing inverse variance weighting (IVW) analysis, we discovered a significant association between TNF and AMI risk, with an OR of 0.946 (95% CI = 0.911-0.984, p = 0.005).
conclusionsThe result of this study indicated that TNF, TLR2, TLR4, IL1B and FCGR3B may be potential biodiagnostic markers for AMI. TNF can inhibit inflammatory and oxidative stress responses in AMI, exerting a protective role in the heart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.