ArticlePloS one2024
On the role of diffusion dynamics on community-aware centrality measures.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influential nodes identification for complex networks based on multi-feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Correction: On the role of diffusion dynamics on community-aware centrality measures.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theoretical and empirical studies on diffusion models have revealed their versatile applicability across different fields, spanning from sociology and finance to biology and ecology. The presence of a community structure within real-world networks has a substantial impact on how diffusion processes unfold. Key nodes located both within and between these communities play a crucial role in initiating diffusion, and community-aware centrality measures effectively identify these nodes. While numerous diffusion models have been proposed in literature, very few studies investigate the relationship between the diffusive ability of key nodes selected by community-aware centrality measures, the distinct dynamical conditions of various models, and the diverse network topologies. By conducting a comparative evaluation across four diffusion models, utilizing both synthetic and real-world networks, along with employing two different community detection techniques, our study aims to gain deeper insights into the effectiveness and applicability of the community-aware centrality measures. Results suggest that the diffusive power of the selected nodes is affected by three main factors: the strength of the network's community structure, the internal dynamics of each diffusion model, and the budget availability. Specifically, within the category of simple contagion models, such as SI, SIR, and IC, we observe similar diffusion patterns when the network's community structure strength and budget remain constant. In contrast, the LT model, which falls under the category of complex contagion dynamics, exhibits divergent behavior under the same conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.