ArticlePloS one2024
Biobjective gradient descent for feature selection on high dimension, low sample size data.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Improving segmentation precision in prostate cancer adaptive radiation therapy with a patient-specific network.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though deep learning shows impressive results in several applications, its use on problems with High Dimensions and Low Sample Size, such as diagnosing rare diseases, leads to overfitting. One solution often proposed is feature selection. In deep learning, along with feature selection, network sparsification is also used to improve the results when dealing with high dimensions low sample size data. However, most of the time, they are tackled as separate problems. This paper proposes a new approach that integrates feature selection, based on sparsification, into the training process of a deep neural network. This approach uses a constrained biobjective gradient descent method. It provides a set of Pareto optimal neural networks that make a trade-off between network sparsity and model accuracy. Results on both artificial and real datasets show that using a constrained biobjective gradient descent increases the network sparsity without degrading the classification performances. With the proposed approach, on an artificial dataset, the feature selection score reached 0.97 with a sparsity score of 0.92 with an accuracy of 0.9. For the same accuracy, none of the other methods reached a feature score above 0.20 and sparsity score of 0.35. Finally, statistical tests validate the results obtained on all datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.