Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39024199›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Biobjective gradient descent for feature selection on high dimension, low sample size data.

Tina Issa, Eric Angel, Farida Zehraoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina IssaUniversite Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, IBISC, Evry-Courcouronnes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-8840
Eric AngelUniversite Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, IBISC, Evry-Courcouronnes, France.
Farida ZehraouiUniversite Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, IBISC, Evry-Courcouronnes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-1680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though deep learning shows impressive results in several applications, its use on problems with High Dimensions and Low Sample Size, such as diagnosing rare diseases, leads to overfitting. One solution often proposed is feature selection. In deep learning, along with feature selection, network sparsification is also used to improve the results when dealing with high dimensions low sample size data. However, most of the time, they are tackled as separate problems. This paper proposes a new approach that integrates feature selection, based on sparsification, into the training process of a deep neural network. This approach uses a constrained biobjective gradient descent method. It provides a set of Pareto optimal neural networks that make a trade-off between network sparsity and model accuracy. Results on both artificial and real datasets show that using a constrained biobjective gradient descent increases the network sparsity without degrading the classification performances. With the proposed approach, on an artificial dataset, the feature selection score reached 0.97 with a sparsity score of 0.92 with an accuracy of 0.9. For the same accuracy, none of the other methods reached a feature score above 0.20 and sparsity score of 0.35. Finally, statistical tests validate the results obtained on all datasets.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansSample Size

Identifiers

PMID39024199
PMCPMC11257339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.