ArticleJMIR research protocols2024
Quantification of Urinary Exosomal Prostate-Specific Antigen for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Using Clinical Laboratory-Based Techniques: Protocol for a Case-Control Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in urinary extracellular vesicles originating from the genitourinary system in health and disease.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Urine-based PSMA detection for noninvasive prostate cancer diagnosis: recent advances, translational challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer is the most common cancer in men and represents a major public health problem. The current method for the diagnosis or screening of prostate cancer is invasive and costly. There have been renewed and innovative studies searching for urinary biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially with technologies based on urinary exosomes. However, technologies based on urine exosomes usually need expensive machines such as an ultracentrifuge and they are difficult to standardize, which hinder their application in clinical laboratories. We have optimized and standardized the isolation of urinary exosomes with the precipitation method. We have found that urinary exosomal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can be quantified by automatic Elecsys total PSA technique.
objectiveIn this study, our objective is to utilize urinary exosomes from prostate cancer for the development of a test to aid in its diagnosis.
methodsExosomes from the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP was used to set up the technique. To analyze urine samples from patients, the methods include the collection of first-void urine using the Colli-Pee device, the isolation of urine exosomes using the optimized precipitation method, and the quantification of exosomal PSA by Elecsys total PSA.
resultsThis will be a 2-year study. We will start including patients and controls in the last quarter of 2024. We expect the results to be published in the second quarter of 2027.
conclusionsThis is the first study to quantify urinary exosomal PSA using the Elecsys total PSA technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This study emphasizes techniques that are suitable for implementation in clinical laboratories, which will facilitate the application of urinary exosomes to simplify and improve the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/63551.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.