Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023969›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2024

Stratification to Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer by Regimen and Transcriptional Signatures.

Umair Mahmood, Andrew Blake, Sanjay Rathee, Leslie Samuel, Graeme Murray, David Sebag-Montefiore, Simon Gollins, Nicholas P West, Rubina Begum, Simon P Bach and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Umair MahmoodDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2926-3205
Andrew BlakeDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8154-6253
Sanjay RatheeDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2853-0842
Leslie SamuelSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-8670
Graeme MurraySchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3981-2420
David Sebag-MontefioreLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5978-9259
Simon GollinsNorth Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Besti Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bodelwyddan, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-8035-5463
Nicholas P WestLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-6709
Rubina BegumCancer Research & University College London Clinical Trial Unit, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-0967-5411
Simon P BachCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8412-7241
Susan D RichmanLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5041
Phil QuirkeLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-5444
Keara L RedmondThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-0728
Manuel Salto-TellezThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-282X
Viktor H KoelzerDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-4885
Simon J LeedhamWellcome Trust Centre for Human genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1476-6982
Ian TomlinsonDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-1470
Philip D DunneThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-283X
Francesca M BuffaDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0409-406X
S:CORT consortium
Tim S MaughanDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0580-5065
Enric DomingoDepartment of Oncology, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-8767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in rectal cancer has been associated with immune and stromal features that are captured by transcriptional signatures. However, how such associations perform across different chemoradiotherapy regimens and within individual consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and how they affect survival remain unclear. In this study, gene expression and clinical data of pretreatment biopsies from nine cohorts of primary rectal tumors were combined (N = 826). Exploratory analyses were done with transcriptomic signatures for the endpoint of pathologic complete response (pCR), considering treatment regimen or CMS subtype. Relevant findings were tested for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Immune and stromal signatures were strongly associated with pCR and lack of pCR, respectively, in RT and capecitabine (Cap)/5-fluorouracil (5FU)-treated patients (N = 387), in which the radiosensitivity signature (RSS) showed the strongest association. Upon addition of oxaliplatin (Ox; N = 123), stromal signatures switched direction and showed higher chances to achieve pCR than without Ox (p for interaction 0.02). Among Cap/5FU patients, most signatures performed similarly across CMS subtypes, except cytotoxic lymphocytes that were associated with pCR in CMS1 and CMS4 cases compared with other CMS subtypes (p for interaction 0.04). The only variables associated with survival were pCR and RSS. Although the frequency of pCR across different chemoradiation regimens is relatively similar, our data suggest that response rates may differ depending on the biological landscape of rectal cancer. Response to neoadjuvant RT in stroma-rich tumors may potentially be improved by the addition of Ox. RSS in preoperative biopsies provides predictive information for response specifically to neoadjuvant RT with 5FU. SIGNIFICANCE: Rectal cancers with stromal features may respond better to RT and 5FU/Cap with the addition of Ox. Within patients not treated with Ox, high levels of cytotoxic lymphocytes associate with response only in immune and stromal tumors. Our analyses provide biological insights about the outcome by different radiotherapy regimens in rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsTranscriptomeAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineFemaleFluorouracilGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinCapecitabineFluorouracilOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID39023969
PMCPMC11257085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.