Trial reportJAMA network open2024
Comparative Effectiveness of Three Digital Interventions for Adults Seeking Psychiatric Services: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04342494 (Providing Mental Health Precision Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Providing Mental Health Precision Treatment
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The waiting room of uncertainty: digital patient support for potentially bad news-a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of digital mental health intervention engagement among treatment-seeking psychiatric outpatients.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness, Usability, and Satisfaction of a Self-Administered Digital Intervention for Reducing Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a University Community in the Andean Region of Peru: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Connected care in a digital world: Engagement and telehealth use in older cancer survivors.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Cognitive Functions of Older Adults With Software Robot: Longitudinal Exploratory Field Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Meals that heal: a randomized controlled trial testing the feasibility of commercial meal delivery as a convenient dietary intervention for depression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sleep, Physical Activity, and Mood Among People Seeking Mental Health Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Psychological trajectories following brief mindfulness training: a longitudinal comparison of active and passive controls.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Mobile Applications for Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A comparison of the impact of nurse-led education and telehealth interventions on mental health outcomes for ambulatory patients in Saudi Arabia.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Program evaluation of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety and depression in a digital clinic.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2025Article
- Improving Mental Health and Well-Being Through the Paradym App: Quantitative Study of Real-World Data.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Digital Mental Health Tools and AI Therapy Chatbots: A Balanced Approach to Regulation.The Hastings Center reportArticle
- Informing the Development of Reminiscence Technology for Older Adults: A Prospective Study of Acceptance Determinants.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There is a substantial gap between demand for and availability of mental health services. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are promising tools for bridging this gap, yet little is known about their comparative effectiveness. Objective: To assess whether patients randomized to a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based or mindfulness-based DMHI had greater improvements in mental health symptoms than patients randomized to the enhanced personalized feedback (EPF)-only DMHI. DESIGN,: SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 13, 2020, and December 12, 2022, with follow-up at 6 weeks. Adult patients of outpatient psychiatry services across various clinics within the University of Michigan Health System with a scheduled or recent outpatient psychiatry appointment were recruited. Eligible patients were randomized to an intervention arm. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 intervention arms: (1) EPF only; (2) Silvercloud only, a mobile application designed to deliver CBT strategies; (3) Silvercloud plus EPF; (4) Headspace only, a mobile application designed to train users in mindfulness practices; and (5) Headspace plus EPF. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; score range: 0-27, with higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms). Secondary outcomes included changes in anxiety, suicidality, and substance use symptoms. Results: A total of 2079 participants (mean [SD] age, 36.8 [14.3] years; 1423 self-identified as women [68.4%]) completed the baseline survey. The baseline mean (SD) PHQ-9 score was 12.7 (6.4) and significantly decreased for all 5 intervention arms at 6 weeks (from -2.1 [95% CI, -2.6 to -1.7] to -2.9 [95% CI, -3.4 to -2.4]; n = 1885). The magnitude of change was not significantly different across the 5 arms (F4,1879 = 1.19; P = .31). Additionally, the groups did not differ in decrease in anxiety or substance use symptoms. However, the Headspace arms reported significantly greater improvements on a suicidality measure subscale compared with the Silvercloud arms (mean difference in mean change = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.20-1.06; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found decreases in depression and anxiety symptoms across all DMHIs and minimal evidence that specific applications were better than others. The findings suggest that DMHIs may provide support for patients during waiting list-related delays in care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04342494.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.