ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
Interrogating erectile dysfunction and evaluating novel therapeutic frontiers, with emphasis on stem cell strategies.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systemic impacts of diabetes on spermatogenesis and intervention strategies: multilayered mechanism analysis and cutting-edge therapeutic approaches.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male infertility arises from a complex interplay of factors affecting reproductive organs and various physiological pathways. Among these, erectile dysfunction (ED), a widespread global issue, plays a key role. While existing ED treatments address some aspects, achieving complete reversibility and avoiding side effects remains a challenge. In this context, stem cell therapy emerges as a promising, potentially transformative approach. Preliminary evidence from preclinical animal models and clinical trials highlights stem cell therapy's remarkable efficacy and effectiveness for ED. This novel strategy offers several advantages, including enhanced effectiveness and a reported absence of adverse side effects. This review delves into the causes of male infertility, with a particular focus on ED and its pathophysiology. We explore the current treatment landscape, highlighting therapy's existing strategies' limitations and stem cell therapy's unique potential. By examining relevant preclinical and clinical studies, we provide a comprehensive picture of this innovative approach and its promising future in restoring men's fertility and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.