ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024
Electrophysiological Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EP-CMR)-Guided Interventional Procedures: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging excels in providing detailed three-dimensional anatomical information together with excellent soft tissue contrast and has already become a valuable tool for diagnostic evaluation, electrophysiological procedure (EP) planning, and therapeutical stratification of atrial or ventricular rhythm disorders. CMR-based identification of ablation targets may significantly impact existing concepts of interventional electrophysiology. In order to exploit the inherent advantages of CMR imaging to the fullest, CMR-guided ablation procedures (EP-CMR) are justly considered the ultimate goal. RECENT
findingsElectrophysiological cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EP-CMR) interventional procedures have more recently been introduced to the CMR armamentarium: in a single-center series of 30 patients, an EP-CMR guided ablation success of 93% has been reported, which is comparable to conventional ablation outcomes for typical atrial flutter and procedure and ablation time were also reported to be comparable. However, moving on from already established workflows for the ablation of typical atrial flutter in the interventional CMR environment to treatment of more complex ventricular arrhythmias calls for technical advances regarding development of catheters, sheaths and CMR-compatible defibrillator equipment. CMR imaging has already become an important diagnostic tool in the standard clinical assessment of cardiac arrhythmias. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of performing electrophysiological interventional procedures within the CMR environment and fully CMR-guided ablation of typical atrial flutter can be implemented as a routine procedure in experienced centers. Building upon established workflows, the market release of new, CMR-compatible interventional devices may finally enable targeting ventricular arrhythmias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39023800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.