Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023716›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2024

A Bayesian Model Based on Local Phenotypic Resistance Data to Inform Empiric Antibiotic Escalation Decisions.

Ranjeet Bamber, Brian Sullivan, Léo Gorman, Winnie W Y Lee, Matthew B Avison, Andrew W Dowsey, Philip B Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ranjeet BamberDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-4559
Brian SullivanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5275-3931
Léo GormanJean Golding Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2279-6487
Winnie W Y LeeSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-0984
Matthew B AvisonSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-8440
Andrew W DowseyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-9128
Philip B WilliamsUK Health Security Agency, and University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK. philip.williams2@uhbw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-3706

Funding

Health Data Research UK HDR CF0129Medical Research Council MR/T005408/1MRF MRF-145-0004-TPG-AVISO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinicians commonly escalate empiric antibiotic therapy due to poor clinical progress without microbiology guidance. When escalating, they should take account of how resistance to an initial antibiotic affects the probability of resistance to subsequent options. The term "escalation antibiogram" (EA) has been coined to describe this concept. One difficulty when applying the EA concept to clinical practice is understanding the uncertainty in results and how this changes for specific patient subgroups.

methodsA Bayesian model was developed to estimate antibiotic resistance rates in Gram-negative bloodstream infections based on phenotypic resistance data. The model generates a series of "credible" curves to fit the resistance data, each with the same probability of representing the true rate given the inherent uncertainty. To avoid overfitting, an integrated penalisation term adaptively smooths the curves given the level of evidence.

resultsRates of resistance to empiric first-choice and potential escalation antibiotics were calculated for the whole hospitalised population based on 10,486 individual bloodstream infections, and for a range of specific patient groups, including ICU (intensive care unit), haematolo-oncology, and paediatric patients. The model generated an expected value (posterior mean) with 95% credible interval to illustrate uncertainty, based on the size of the patient subgroup. For example, the posterior means of piperacillin/tazobactam resistance rates in Gram-negative bloodstream infection are different between patients on ICU and the general hospital population: 27.3% (95% CI 18.1-37.2 vs. 13.4% 95% CI 11.0-16.1) respectively. The model can also estimate the probability of inferiority between two antibiotics for a specific patient population. Differences in optimal escalation antibiotic options between specific patient groups were noted.

conclusionsEA analysis informed by our Bayesian model is a useful tool to support empiric antibiotic switches, providing an estimate of local resistance rates, and a comparison of antibiotic options with a measure of the uncertainty in the data. We demonstrate that EAs calculated for the whole hospital population cannot be assumed to apply to specific patient group.

Indexed as

Antibiotic escalationAntibiotic stewardshipEmpiric treatmentEscalation antibiogram

Identifiers

PMID39023716
PMCPMC11343932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.