Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023683›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2024

Who Benefits? A Mixed Methods Study Assessing Community Use of a Major Metropolitan Park During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Áine O'Connor, Eugen Resendiz, Leah Nason, Amy A Eyler, Ross C Brownson, Rodrigo S Reis, Ann Banchoff, Abby C King, Deborah Salvo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Áine O'ConnorPeople, Health, and Place Unit, Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-4092
Eugen ResendizPeople, Health, and Place Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas in Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-879X
Leah NasonPeople, Health, and Place Unit, Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Austin, TX, USA.
Amy A EylerPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-1656
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rodrigo S ReisPeople, Health, and Place Unit, Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-9865
Ann BanchoffStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0185-2200
Abby C KingStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7949-8811
Deborah SalvoPeople, Health, and Place Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas in Austin, Austin, TX, USA. dsalvo@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9726-0882

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
The Retain Study: Recruiting and Engaging with Technology Older Adults to Increase NeurocognitionU48DP006395 · DP · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2018 to 2023
$4.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006395NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By providing spaces for recreation, physical activity, social gatherings, and time in nature, urban parks offer physical, mental, and social benefits to users. However, many urban residents face barriers to park use. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new potential barriers to urban park access and use, including changes to daily life and employment, closure of park amenities and restrictions to public movement, and risk from the coronavirus itself. The mixed-methods PARCS study measured use and perceptions of a large urban park in St. Louis, Missouri before, during, and after local COVID-19 contingency measures and restrictions. We examine data from 1,157 direct observation assessments of park usership, an online survey of park users (n=561), interviews with key stakeholders (n=27), four focus groups (n=30), and a community-based participatory research sub-study (n=66) to comprehensively characterize the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on park use. Park users who felt unsafe from the coronavirus experienced 2.65 higher odds of reducing park use. However, estimated park visits during COVID-19 contingency measures (n=5,023,759) were twice as high as post-contingency (n=2,277,496). Participants reported using the park for physical activity, recreation, time in nature, and socializing during the contingency period. Black, Hispanic/Latino, and young people were less likely to visit the park than others, suggesting an additional, disproportionate impact of the pandemic on minoritized and socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. This study highlights the role of public spaces like parks as resources for health and sites where urban health inequities can be alleviated in times of public crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Parks, RecreationalSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMissouriPandemicsRecreationUrban PopulationHealth and PlaceHealth EquityMixed MethodsPhysical ActivityUrban Parks

Identifiers

PMID39023683
PMCPMC11329476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.