ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Prognostic impact of the high-sensitivity modified glasgow prognostic score on patients undergoing radical surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma : Authorship.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Progression-Free Survival in BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Hepatic Recompensation in Decompensated Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic Value of Four Objective Nutritional Indices in Predicting Long-Term Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur study aimed to assess the ability of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) predicting survival in patients undergoing radical surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare the impact with other Inflammation-Based prognostic scoring systems including Glasgow prognostic Score (GPS) and modified GPS (mGPS).
methodsOur study evaluated 293 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between 2010 and 2018. The HS-mGPS, mGPS, and GPS were calculated based on particular cut-off values of preoperative C-reactive protein and albumin, and the correlations between HS-mGPS and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. To evaluate the discrimination ability of each prognostic score, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were generated and the areas under the curve (AUC) were measured and compared.
resultThe study results indicated a correlation between elevated HS-mGPS scores and adverse clinical factors, including higher BCLC stage, C-P grade, multiple tumors, and larger tumor diameter. Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analyses revealed that higher scores of HS-mGPS, GPS, and mGPS were all associated with significantly reduced overall survival (OS) (all p < 0.001). In multivariate survival analysis, HS-mGPS emerged as an independent risk factor for poor OS in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC (p = 0.010), along with factors including maximal tumor diameter (p < 0.001), microvascular invasion (MVI) (p = 0.008), and BCLC stage (p = 0.001). The analysis of ROC curves and the AUC values indicated that HS-mGPS outperforms GPS and mGPS in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable HCC.
conclusionPreoperative HS-mGPS proves superior in predicting adverse long-term outcomes in HCC patients undergoing radical surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39023651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.