Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023556›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024

Giant cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder : Clinicopathologic analysis and oncological outcomes.

Frederico Portugal-Gaspar, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Gladell P Paner, Ana Blanca, Enrique Gómez Gómez, Rodolfo Montironi, Alessia Cimadamore, Andreia Bilé, Metka Volavšek, Liang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederico Portugal-Gaspar *Urology Department, Egas Moniz Hospital, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
Antonio Lopez-Beltran *Department of Morphological Sciences, Cordoba University Medical School, E-14004, Cordoba, Spain. em1lobea@uco.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-8164
Gladell P PanerDepartments of Pathology and Surgery (Urology), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ana BlancaMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, E-14004, Cordoba, Spain.
Enrique Gómez GómezUrology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Maimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Cordoba, Spain.
Rodolfo MontironiMolecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy.
Alessia CimadamoreInstitute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DMED), Udine University, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Andreia BiléUrology Department, Egas Moniz Hospital, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
Metka VolavšekInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Liang ChengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery/Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Health, and The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the clinicopathological features of 23 cases of the giant cell subtype of urothelial carcinoma, a rare subtype of bladder cancer recognized in the current World Health Organization classification of urological tumors. Histologically, the architectural pattern of the tumor varied from infiltrating to the solid expansile pleomorphic tumor with giant, bizarre, anaplastic cells. Typical or atypical mitotic figures were frequently present in all cases. Between 10 and 30% of the tumor had a giant cell component. All cases were associated with conventional high-grade urothelial carcinoma, with areas of squamous cell divergent differentiation and micropapillary carcinoma present in six and two cases, respectively. In one case each had sarcomatoid, nested, small cell, or glandular divergent differentiation. At diagnosis, 35% of patients had advanced disease and 12% had distant metastases. When comparing giant cell urothelial carcinoma with conventional urothelial carcinoma in a matched analysis, differences in overall and cancer-specific survival were observed, particularly in the T1 stage category. Immunohistochemical staining showed a similar profile of urothelial lineage with frequent positive expression of uroplakin II, GATA3, CK20, CK7, and S100P in both giant cell and conventional urothelial carcinomas. High Ki67 proliferation (range, 60-90%; mean, 71%) and nuclear p53 accumulation (mutant profile; range, 50-90%; mean, 64%) were observed. Using the 22C3 assay, the expression of PD-L1 was found to be variable in two cases, and beta-HCG was negative. In conclusion, giant cell carcinoma is a subtype of urothelial carcinoma associated with advanced clinical stage and a trend to lower survival rates.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Giant CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancerGiant cell carcinomaProgressionSubtypeVariant

Identifiers

PMID39023556
PMCPMC11415457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.