Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023519›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Non-Hebbian plasticity transforms transient experiences into lasting memories.

Islam Faress, Valentina Khalil, Wen-Hsien Hou, Andrea Moreno, Niels Andersen, Rosalina Fonseca, Joaquin Piriz, Marco Capogna, Sadegh Nabavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Islam FaressDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark.
Valentina Khalil *Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-8596
Wen-Hsien Hou *Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andrea MorenoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark.
Niels AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark.
Rosalina FonsecaCellular and Systems Neurobiology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joaquin PirizInstituto de Fisiología Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marco CapognaDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sadegh NabaviDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-1210

Funding

Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience 19958Danmarks Grundforskningsfond DNRF133European Research Council 22736Lundbeck Foundation R273-2017-179Lundbeck Foundation R360-2021-650The National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion of Argentina PICT-2021-I-A-00494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dominant models of learning and memory, such as Hebbian plasticity, propose that experiences are transformed into memories through input-specific synaptic plasticity at the time of learning. However, synaptic plasticity is neither strictly input-specific nor restricted to the time of its induction. The impact of such forms of non-Hebbian plasticity on memory has been difficult to test, and hence poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that synaptic manipulations can deviate from the Hebbian model of learning, yet produce a lasting memory. First, we established a weak associative conditioning protocol in mice, where optogenetic stimulation of sensory thalamic input to the amygdala was paired with a footshock, but no detectable memory was formed. However, when the same input was potentiated minutes before or after, or even 24 hr later, the associative experience was converted into a lasting memory. Importantly, potentiating an independent input to the amygdala minutes but not 24 hr after the pairing produced a lasting memory. Thus, our findings suggest that the process of transformation of a transient experience into a memory is neither restricted to the time of the experience nor to the synapses triggered by it; instead, it can be influenced by past and future events.

Indexed as

AmygdalaMemoryNeuronal PlasticityOptogeneticsAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLThalamusamygdalafear memoryheterosynaptic LTPLTPmouseneuroscienceoptogeneticssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39023519
PMCPMC11257676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.