Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023517›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

An allocentric human odometer for perceiving distances on the ground plane.

Liu Zhou, Wei Wei, Teng Leng Ooi, Zijiang J He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liu ZhouDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Wei WeiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Teng Leng OoiCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.
Zijiang J HeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-9016

Funding

Visual mechanisms of intermediate distance space perception during self-motionR01EY033190 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HE, ZIJIANG, OOI, TENG LENG · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY 033190NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reliably judge locations of static objects when we walk despite the retinal images of these objects moving with every step we take. Here, we showed our brains solve this optical illusion by adopting an allocentric spatial reference frame. We measured perceived target location after the observer walked a short distance from the home base. Supporting the allocentric coding scheme, we found the intrinsic bias , which acts as a spatial reference frame for perceiving location of a dimly lit target in the dark, remained grounded at the home base rather than traveled along with the observer. The path-integration mechanism responsible for this can utilize both active and passive (vestibular) translational motion signals, but only along the horizontal direction. This asymmetric path-integration finding in human visual space perception is reminiscent of the asymmetric spatial memory finding in desert ants, pointing to nature's wondrous and logically simple design for terrestrial creatures.

Indexed as

Distance PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleOptical IllusionsSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adultallocentric reference framedepth perceptionhippocampal formationhumanneurosciencepath integrationslef-motionvisual space perception

Identifiers

PMID39023517
PMCPMC11257686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.