ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Pain sensitisation in patients with sickle cell disease: A preliminary study.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of central pain sensitization in chronic low back pain and its utility in diagnosis and prediction of clinical severity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pain sensitisation in patients with sickle cell disease: A preliminary study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResponses to experimental pain have suggested central and peripheral sensitisation in adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Recent studies have proposed an algometry-derived dynamic measure of pain sensitisation, slowly repeated evoked pain (SREP), which is useful in the discrimination of painful conditions related to central sensitisation. Pain and fatigue are two symptoms that affect the general functioning of patients with SCD most significantly, however, research about experimental dynamic pain measures and their relation to the main symptoms of SCD (pain and fatigue) is still scarce.
objectiveThis preliminary study aimed to test the utility of the SREP protocol for detecting pain sensitisation in patients with SCD, and to evaluate the associations of pain sensitisation, pain threshold, and pain tolerance with the main clinical symptoms of SCD, pain and fatigue.
methodsTwenty-two female outpatients with SCD and 20 healthy women participated. Pain threshold, pain tolerance, and pain sensitisation were assessed by algometry in the fingernail. Clinical pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression and pain catastrophizing were evaluated.
resultsNo group differences were found in pain threshold and tolerance. However, using the SREP protocol, pain sensitisation was greater in patients than in healthy participants, even after controlling for psychological variables and body mass index. Pain threshold and tolerance were inversely associated with fatigue levels in the SCD group, with pain tolerance being the main predictor.
conclusionsPain threshold and tolerance did not discriminate between patients and healthy individuals, but were useful for predicting fatigue severity in SCD. The SREP protocol provides a useful dynamic measure of pain for the discrimination and detection of enhanced pain sensitisation in patients with SCD, which could contribute to more personalised pain evaluations and treatment for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.