Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39023234›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2024

Hospital falls clinical practice guidelines: a global analysis and systematic review.

Jonathan P McKercher, Casey L Peiris, Anne-Marie Hill, Stephen Peterson, Claire Thwaites, Sally Fowler-Davis, Meg E Morris

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan P McKercherLa Trobe University Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), and CERI, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8839-8353
Casey L PeirisLa Trobe University Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), and CERI, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0686-7436
Anne-Marie HillSchool of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1411-6752
Stephen PetersonLa Trobe University Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), and CERI, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Claire ThwaitesLa Trobe University Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), and CERI, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4045-2090
Sally Fowler-DavisSchool of Allied Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3870-9272
Meg E MorrisLa Trobe University Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), and CERI, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0114-4175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital falls continue to be a persistent global issue with serious harmful consequences for patients and health services. Many clinical practice guidelines now exist for hospital falls, and there is a need to appraise recommendations.

methodA systematic review and critical appraisal of the global literature was conducted, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Infobase of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Cochrane CENTRAL and PEDro databases were searched from 1 January 1993 to 1 February 2024. The quality of guidelines was assessed by two independent reviewers using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Global Rating Scale and Appraisal of Guidelines of Research and Evaluation Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX). Certainty of findings was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis.

results2404 records were screened, 77 assessed for eligibility, and 20 hospital falls guidelines were included. Ten had high AGREE-REX quality scores. Key analytic themes were as follows: (i) there was mixed support for falls risk screening at hospital admission, but scored screening tools were no longer recommended; (ii) comprehensive falls assessment was recommended for older or frail patients; (iii) single and multifactorial falls interventions were consistently recommended; (iv) a large gap existed in patient engagement in guideline development and implementation; (v) barriers to implementation included ambiguities in how staff and patient falls education should be conducted, how delirium and dementia are managed to prevent falls, and documentation of hospital falls.

conclusionEvidence-based hospital falls guidelines are now available, yet systematic implementation across the hospital sector is more limited. There is a need to ensure an integrated and consistent approach to evidence-based falls prevention for a diverse range of hospital patients.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedHospitalizationHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsaccidental fallsclinical practice guidelinesfalls preventionhospitalolder peoplesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39023234
PMCPMC11255989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.