ArticleBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2026
Impact of prior oral anticoagulation on admission stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01541163 (Assessment of Relationship Between Acute Ischemic Stroke and Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Relationship Between Acute Ischemic Stroke and Heart Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-Ever Stroke Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-world use and impact of direct oral anticoagulants among atrial fibrillation patients with cardioembolic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIn patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation therapy is indicated for both primary and secondary prevention of stroke/systemic embolism. Though direct oral anticoagulants with greater safety and efficacy than warfarin were introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the last decade, even now not all patients with AF have adequate preventative anticoagulant treatment. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior use of oral anticoagulants on admission stroke severity in those with AF. Other aims were, inter alia, to assess the trend in atrial fibrillation prevalence in the years of the HISTORY trials 2012-2021 carried out in the Czech Republic and use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in ischemic stroke (IS) patients.
methodsWe analyzed consecutive ischemic stroke patients who had been enrolled in the HISTORY (Heart and Ischemic STrOke Relationship studY) study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01541163) in the year 2012 and carried out a yearly comparison (detailed in the text).
resultsIn total, there were 1059 patients (55.9% males, mean age 71.7±12.8). There was no significant difference over the time period in rate of known (18.3 vs. 16.5%, P=0.442) or newly detected AF (17.0 vs. 16.0%, P=0.665), but sigificantly more patients with known AF were treated with oral anticoagulants before IS in the year 2021 (32.1 vs. 70.7%, P<0.0001), and direct oral anticoagulants (3.6 vs. 35.4%, P<0.0001). The number of patients with atrial fibrillation had not changed significantly over the years (26.2 vs. 31.3%). Patients on OAC had a lower median admission score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) than those not using an oral anticoagulant (6 vs. 16, P=0.0004) in 2021.
conclusionsThere was no significant upward trend in atrial fibrillation in stroke patients admitted between 2012 and 2021, but patients with known AF were significantly more frequently treated with oral anticoagulants and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2021. Patients on OAC had lower admission NIHSS scores than those not using any anticoagulent in the year 2021. The difference in the median admission NIHSS between the patients on OAC and those without OAC treatment was not significant in the year 2012 (6 vs. 12, P=0.066). This might be related to the fact that substantially fewer patients in 2012 were on DOACs, which are considered more effective than warfarin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39023063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.