Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022917›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Dietary probiotic based on a dual-strain Bacillus subtilis improves immunity, intestinal health, and growth performance of broiler chickens.

Yuanli Cai, Chuanpi Xiao, Bo Tian, Sandvang Dorthe, Antoine Meuter, Bochen Song, Zhigang Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  13. Nano-Encapsulated Cumin Oil andVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Antimicrobial and Nutritional Potentials ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuanli CaiCollege of Life Science, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250200, China.
Chuanpi XiaoDepartment of Animal Science and Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271018, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-097X
Bo TianDepartment of Animal Science and Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271018, China.
Sandvang DortheAnimal and Plant Health & Nutrition, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm 2970, Denmark.
Antoine MeuterAnimal and Plant Health & Nutrition, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm 2970, Denmark.
Bochen SongDepartment of Animal Science and Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271018, China.
Zhigang SongDepartment of Animal Science and Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271018, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of dietary probiotic of dual-strain Bacillus subtilis on production performance, intestinal barrier parameters, and microbiota in broiler chickens. In a randomized trial, male broiler chickens were allocated into 3 groups, a control group (basal diet), BS300 group (basal diet with 300 mg/kg of B. subtilis), and BS500 group (basal diet with 500 mg/kg of B. subtilis). The inclusion of 500 mg/kg of B. subtilis significantly reduced the feed conversion ratio by 4.55% during the starting phase. Both 300 and 500 mg/kg of B. subtilis supplementation increased jejunal villus height (by 17.89% and 24.8%, respectively) significantly and decreased jejunal crypt depth (by 27.2% and 31.9%, respectively) on day 21. The addition of 500 mg/kg of B. subtilis significantly elevated the gene expression of occludin on day 35. Moreover, of B. subtilis supplementation enhanced cytokine levels and immunoglobulins in both serum and jejunal mucosa. Microbial analysis indicated that B. subtilis increased the abundance of potential probiotics (Sutterella) and butyrate-producing bacteria (Lachnoclostridium, Tyzzerella, Anaerostipes, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_13, Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group, and Lachnospiraceae_UCG-010). The abundances of Anaerostipes and Sutterella, are significantly correlated with growth performance and immune function. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with B. subtilis improved the growth performance, potentially through the regulation of immunity, intestinal barrier function, and microbiota in broilers. Notably, 500 mg/kg of B. subtilis exhibited more benefits for broilers compared to the 300 mg/kg.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBacillus subtilisChickensDietProbioticsAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinesMaleRandom Allocationcecal microbesimmunityintestinal morphologytight junction

Identifiers

PMID39022917
PMCPMC11416885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.