Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022798›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Tumor-informed deep sequencing of ctDNA detects minimal residual disease and predicts relapse in osteosarcoma.

Yiwei Fu, Yu Xu, Weihai Liu, Jiajun Zhang, Fen Wang, Qijie Jian, Gang Huang, Changye Zou, Xianbiao Xie, Albert H Kim and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yiwei FuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yu XuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Weihai LiuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jiajun ZhangDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Fen WangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Qijie JianOrigiMed, Shanghai, 201124, China.
Gang HuangDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Changye ZouDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xianbiao XieDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Albert H KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Dimitrios MathiosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Fei PangOrigiMed, Shanghai, 201124, China.
Feng LiOrigiMed, Shanghai, 201124, China.
Kai WangOrigiMed, Shanghai, 201124, China.
Jingnan ShenDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Junqiang YinDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current surveillance modalities of osteosarcoma relapse exhibit limited sensitivity and specificity. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been established as a biomarker of minimal residual disease (MRD) in many solid tumors, a sensitive ctDNA detection technique has not been thoroughly explored for longitudinal MRD detection in osteosarcoma. Methods: From August 2019 to June 2023, 59 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were evaluated in this study. Tumor-informed MRD panels were developed through whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor tissues. Longitudinal blood samples were collected during treatment and subjected to multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. Findings: WES analysis of 83 patients revealed substantial mutational heterogeneity, with non-recurrent mutated genes accounting for 58.1%. Tumor-informed MRD panels were successfully obtained for 85.5% of patients (71/83). Among 59 patients with successful MRD panel customization and available blood samples, 13 patients exhibited positive ctDNA detection after surgery. Patients with negative post-operative ctDNA had better event-free survival (EFS) compared to those with positive ctDNA, at 1-6 months after surgery, after adjuvant chemotherapy, and more than 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, ctDNA results emerged as a significant predictor of EFS (p < 0.05). ctDNA detection preceded positive imaging in 5 patients, with an average lead time of 92.6 days. Thirty-nine patients remained disease-free, with ctDNA results consistently negative or turning negative during follow-up. Interpretation: Our study underscores the applicability of tumor-informed deep sequencing of ctDNA in osteosarcoma MRD surveillance and, to our knowledge, represents the largest cohort to date. ctDNA detection is a significant prognostic factor, enabling the early identification of tumor relapse and progression compared to standard imaging, thus offering valuable insights in guiding osteosarcoma patient management. Funding: The Grants of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82072964, 82072965, 82203798, 82203026), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2023A1515012659, 2023A1515010302), and the Regional Combination Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2020A1515110010).

Indexed as

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)Minimal residual disease (MRD)Next-generation sequencing (NGS)Osteosarcoma relapseTumor-informed MRD panel

Identifiers

PMID39022798
PMCPMC11252770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.