ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024
Sustained transmission over two decades of a previously unrecognised MPT64 negative
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- National genomic survey of drug-resistance and multi-jurisdictional clusters ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Performance and Cost-Efficiency of an MPT64 Assay for DetectingJournal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal patterns of tuberculosis revealed by routineThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Protein Architecture and Composition in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Considering best practice standards for routine whole-genome sequencing for TB care and control.IJTLD open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: MPT64 is a key protein used for Methods: All MPT64 negative strains identified between 2002 and 2022 by the Queensland Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory, and an additional 2 isolates from New South Wales (NSW), were whole genome sequenced. Bayesian modelling and phylogeographical analyses were used to assess their evolutionary history and transmission dynamics. Protein structural modelling to understand the putative functional effects of the mutated gene coding for MPT64 protein was performed. Findings: Forty-three MPT64 negative isolates were sequenced, belonging to a single MTB cluster of Lineage 4.1.1.1 strains. Combined with a UK dataset of the same lineage, molecular dating estimated 1990 (95% HPD 1987-1993) as the likely time of strain introduction into Australia. Although the strain has spread over a wide geographic area and new cases linked to the cluster continue to arise, phylodynamic analysis suggest the outbreak peaked around 2003. All MPT64 negative strains had a frame shift mutation (delAT, p.Val216fs) within the MPT64 gene, which confers two major structural rearrangements at the C-terminus of the protein. Interpretation: This study uncovered the origins of an MPT64 negative MTB outbreak in Australia, providing a richer understanding of its biology and transmission dynamics, as well as guidance for clinical diagnosis and public health action. The potential spread of MPT64 negative strains undermines the diagnostic utility of the MPT64 immunochromatographic test. Funding: This study was funded from an operational budget provided to the Queensland Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory by Pathology Queensland, Queensland Department of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.