ArticleInnovation in aging2024
The Perspective of Residents Living With Dementia Toward Their Built Environment: A Walking Interview Study in German Nursing Homes.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges when measuring person-centred dementia care in nursing homes: a discussion paper.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Definition and Test-Retest Reliability of a Monitoring Method Integrating Accelerometric Actigraphy and Bluetooth Indoor Location Tracking Applied in a Long-Term Residential Unit for Persons With Dementia: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Observational
- Beyond Satisfaction: Person-Centred Care and the Physical Environment Revisited-An Integrative Review.Nursing open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In long-term care, the built environment can help residents maintain activities of daily living and thus positively influence their quality of life. The adequacy of the built environment can be systematically assessed using assessment tools. The German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT) was translated and psychometrically tested for the German setting. Previous research has shown that the perspective of people living with dementia has not been fully considered in this adaptation. To explore the residents' perspective, the question of how residents living with dementia experience the built environment of nursing homes was investigated. Research Design and Methods: Walking interviews were conducted with residents. Inclusion criteria for participation were the presence of dementia (medically diagnosed or indicated by symptoms) and the ability to express themselves verbally in German. For data analysis, the audio material was transcribed and supplemented by the researchers' field notes and photographs. Data analysis followed an interpretative phenomenological approach. Results: Fourteen residents from 2 nursing homes participated in the walking interviews. A total of 3 themes were identified: (1) being able to maintain the feeling "to refurnish" or having to let it go, (2) experiencing the limits and potentials of being independent because of the built environment, and (3) living in a community of residents. Discussion and Implications: The perspective of the living environment of people living with dementia in nursing homes adds to the knowledge of assessment-based data. Boundaries between physical and social environments are experienced as fluid by residents. They do not see their living space as limited to their living unit but describe the nursing home as a living environment. This broadens the perspective of existing structural definitions in the setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.