ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
Performance verification and clinical evaluation of the NAP-Fluo Cycler system for detecting five genital tract pathogens based on microfluidic technology.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are among the most common infectious diseases worldwide, often leading to coinfections. Timely detection of genital tract pathogens in at-risk populations is crucial for preventing STIs. We evaluated the NAP-Fluo Cycler System, an innovative microfluidic nucleic acid detection platform, for its ability to simultaneously identify Materials and methods: The limits of detection (LODs), repeatability, specificity, and interference resistance of the system were evaluated using standard strains, a panel of 24 pathogens, and seven interferents. We used the system to analyze 302 clinical samples and compared the results with those of five approved commercial reference kits. Results: The system achieved LODs of 500 IFU/mL, 500 CFU/mL, and 500 CCU/mL for CT, NG, and UU/MG/MH, respectively, demonstrating high stability (coefficient of variation <1.1 %), specificity, and resistance to interference. Among 302 clinical samples, 237 tested positive with single, dual, and triple infection rates of 35.6 %, 16.2 %, and 3.0 %, respectively. The reference kits detected 138 positive samples. The concordance rates with commercial reference kits were 100 % for UU, NG, and MH; 94.85 % for CT; and 80.00 % for MG. Conclusions: This system offers a streamlined, rapid, and multiplex detection method that reduces testing time and complexity. Although it performs well with pure strains, it has limitations when using clinical samples of CT and MG, suggesting the need for further refinement before its widespread use in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.