ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy at large source detector separation for cerebral blood flow recovery.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially-offset optical coherence tomography (SO-OCT) for high dynamic range biological imaging at depth.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Characterization of a fiber-coupled SPAD camera system for deep-tissue blood-flow measurement using diffuse correlation spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Approaches for modelling autocorrelation function and data processing in time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy: Technology and Applications: introduction to the feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy (td-DCS) enables the depth discrimination in tissue's blood flow recovery, considering the fraction of photons detected with higher time of flight (TOF) and longer pathlength through the tissue. However, the recovery result depends on factors such as the instrument response function (IRF), analyzed TOF gate start time, gate width and the source-detector separation (SDS). In this research we evaluate the performance of the td-DCS technique at three SDSs of 1.5, 2 and 2.5 cm to recover cerebral blood flow (CBF). To do that we presented comprehensive characterization of the td-DCS system through a series of phantom experiments. First by quality metrices such as coefficient of variation and contrast-to-noise ratios, we identified optimal time gate(s) of the TOF to extract dynamics of particles. Then using sensitivity metrices, each SDS ability to detect dynamics of particles in superficial and deeper layer was evaluated. Finally, td-DCS at each SDS was tested on healthy volunteers during cuff occlusion test and breathing tasks. According to phantom measurements, the sensitivity to estimate perfusion within the deep layer located at depth of 1.5 cm from the surface can be increased more than two times when the SDS increases from 1.5 cm to 2.5 cm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.