ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Reducing privacy risks of China's healthcare big data through the policy framework.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Privacy Policy Compliance of Mobile Sports and Health Apps in China: Scale Development, Data Analysis, and Prospects for Regulatory Reform.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Internet healthcare in Chinese public hospitals: Towards high-quality development (1986-present).AIMS public health · 2026Review
- A narrative review of health inequalities in dementia care in China: exploring mHealth's potential.mHealth · 2026Review
- From ownership to custodianship: rethinking human biospecimens data governance in the Chinese context.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Content analysis and optimization suggestions for China's big data on healthcare policy from the perspective of policy tools.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While healthcare big data brings great opportunities and convenience to the healthcare industry, it also inevitably raises the issue of privacy leakage. Nowadays, the whole world is facing the security threat of healthcare big data, for which a sound policy framework can help reduce privacy risks of healthcare big data. In recent years, the Chinese government and industry self-regulatory organizations have issued a series of policy documents to reduce privacy risks of healthcare big data. However, China's policy framework suffers from the drawbacks of the mismatched operational model, the inappropriate operational method, and the poorly actionable operational content. Based on the experiences of the European Union, Australia, the United States, and other extra-territorial regions, strategies are proposed for China to amend the operational model of the policy framework, improve the operational method of the policy framework, and enhance the operability of the operational content of the policy framework. This study enriches the research on China's policy framework to reduce privacy risks of healthcare big data and provides some inspiration for other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.