Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

"You can push these conversations, but don't push your patient away": healthcare learner perspectives on virtual simulation games as an educational approach to address vaccine hesitancy.

Emily J Doucette, Margaret Pateman, Madison M Fullerton, Alyssa Lip, Sherilyn K D Houle, James D Kellner, Jenine Leal, Shannon E MacDonald, Deborah McNeil, Sandra Davidson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily J DoucetteDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Margaret PatemanFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Madison M FullertonFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alyssa LipDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sherilyn K D HouleSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
James D KellnerDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jenine LealDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Shannon E MacDonaldDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Deborah McNeilFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sandra DavidsonFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cora ConstantinescuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a significant threat to public health. Healthcare providers (HCPs) can address hesitancy during routine patient conversations; however, few multidisciplinary education tools exist for HCPs to learn to engage in vaccine discussion especially considering new vaccine technologies such as mRNA vaccines. The objectives of this study were to explore HCP learners' experiences with COVID-19 vaccine communication, and qualitatively evaluate an online learning module composed of virtual simulation games (VSGs) which utilize the PrOTCT Framework for HCP vaccine communication. Methods: Three virtual focus groups were conducted from December 2022 to January 2023 with Canadian healthcare learners in nursing ( Results: A total of 22 HCP learners participated in this study and three key themes were identified. Across all three disciplines, participants expressed that (1) their prior education lacked training on how to hold vaccine conversations, resulting in uncomfortable personal experiences with patients; (2) the VSGs increased their confidence in holding vaccine conversations by providing novel tools and skills; and (3) participants also provided feedback to improve the VSGs which was implemented and supported the dissemination to all HCP professions. Conclusion: Although HCPs are a trusted source of vaccine information, participants in this study felt they received little training on how to engage in challenging conversations regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The introduction of the PrOTCT Framework and presumptive statements provided novel strategies for HCP to initiate vaccine conversations, especially considering new vaccine technologies and participants appreciated the emphasis on coping strategies and resilience. It is essential that HCP are provided both opportunities to practice managing these conversations, and tools and skills to succeed at an early point in their careers to prepare them for future roles in vaccine advocacy, delivery, and promotion.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelVaccination HesitancyAdultCanadaCommunicationCOVID-19FemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinescommunicationfocus groupsqualitative researchthematic analysisvaccine hesitancyvirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID39022406
PMCPMC11252083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.