Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022375›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2024

Developing a Framework for Self-regulatory Governance in Healthcare AI Research: Insights from South Korea.

Junhewk Kim, So Yoon Kim, Eun-Ae Kim, Jin-Ah Sim, Yuri Lee, Hannah Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junhewk KimDepartment of Dental Education, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-270X
So Yoon KimAsian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-357X
Eun-Ae KimCenter for Research Compliance, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-559X
Jin-Ah SimDepartment of AI Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-3002
Yuri LeeDepartment of Health and Medical Information, Myongji College, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0584-650X
Hannah KimAsian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-9745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper elucidates and rationalizes the ethical governance system for healthcare AI research, as outlined in the 'Research Ethics Guidelines for AI Researchers in Healthcare' published by the South Korean government in August 2023. In developing the guidelines, a four-phase clinical trial process was expanded to six stages for healthcare AI research: preliminary ethics review (stage 1); creating datasets (stage 2); model development (stage 3); training, validation, and evaluation (stage 4); application (stage 5); and post-deployment monitoring (stage 6). Researchers identified similarities between clinical trials and healthcare AI research, particularly in research subjects, management and regulations, and application of research results. In the step-by-step articulation of ethical requirements, this similarity benefits from a reliable and flexible use of existing research ethics governance resources, research management, and regulatory functions. In contrast to clinical trials, this procedural approach to healthcare AI research governance effectively highlights the distinct characteristics of healthcare AI research in research and development process, evaluation of results, and modifiability of findings. The model exhibits limitations, primarily in its reliance on self-regulation and lack of clear delineation of responsibilities. While formulated through multidisciplinary deliberations, its application in the research field remains untested. To overcome the limitations, the researchers' ongoing efforts for educating AI researchers and public and the revision of the guidelines are expected to contribute to establish an ethical research governance framework for healthcare AI research in the South Korean context in the future.

Indexed as

AI governanceHealthcare AI researchInterdisciplinary approachResearch ethicsResearch governanceSelf-regulation

Identifiers

PMID39022375
PMCPMC11250738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.