Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022338›Full record

ReviewOncoimmunology2024

Human NK cells and cancer.

Claudia Cantoni, Michela Falco, Massimo Vitale, Gabriella Pietra, Enrico Munari, Daniela Pende, Maria Cristina Mingari, Simona Sivori, Lorenzo Moretta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncoimmunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claudia CantoniDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6471-1424
Michela FalcoLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Integrated Department of Services and Laboratories, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0317-9830
Massimo VitaleUO Pathology and Experimental Immunology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-7885
Gabriella PietraDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-531X
Enrico MunariPathology Unit, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3867-6685
Daniela PendeUO Pathology and Experimental Immunology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1565-451X
Maria Cristina MingariDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6998-5459
Simona SivoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1279-1172
Lorenzo MorettaTumor Immunology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-1747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long story of NK cells started about 50 y ago with the first demonstration of a natural cytotoxic activity within an undefined subset of circulating leukocytes, has involved an ever-growing number of researchers, fascinated by the apparently easy-to-reach aim of getting a "universal anti-tumor immune tool". In fact, in spite of the impressive progress obtained in the first decades, these cells proved far more complex than expected and, paradoxically, the accumulating findings have continuously moved forward the attainment of a complete control of their function for immunotherapy. The refined studies of these latter years have indicated that NK cells can epigenetically calibrate their functional potential, in response to specific environmental contexts, giving rise to extraordinarily variegated subpopulations, comprehensive of memory-like cells, tissue-resident cells, or cells in various differentiation stages, or distinct functional states. In addition, NK cells can adapt their activity in response to a complex body of signals, spanning from the interaction with either suppressive or stimulating cells (myeloid-derived suppressor cells or dendritic cells, respectively) to the engagement of various receptors (specific for immune checkpoints, cytokines, tumor/viral ligands, or mediating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity). According to this picture, the idea of an easy and generalized exploitation of NK cells is changing, and the way is opening toward new carefully designed, combined and personalized therapeutic strategies, also based on the use of genetically modified NK cells and stimuli capable of strengthening and redirecting their effector functions against cancer.

Indexed as

Killer Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyHuman natural killer cellsNK cell-based immunotherapyNK cell receptorsreceptor–ligand interactionstumor escapetumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39022338
PMCPMC11253890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.