Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022293›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Deep learning methods for diagnosis of graves' ophthalmopathy using magnetic resonance imaging.

Zi-Chang Ma, Jun-Yu Lin, Shao-Kang Li, Hua-Jin Liu, Ya-Qin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zi-Chang MaDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Jun-Yu LinDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Shao-Kang LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Hua-Jin LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Ya-Qin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effect of diagnosing Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) through traditional measurement and observation in medical imaging is not ideal. This study aimed to develop and validate deep learning (DL) models that could be applied to the diagnosis of GO based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare them to traditional measurement and judgment of radiologists. Methods: A total of 199 clinically verified consecutive GO patients and 145 normal controls undergoing MRI were retrospectively recruited, of whom 240 were randomly assigned to the training group and 104 to the validation group. Areas of superior, inferior, medial, and lateral rectus muscles and all rectus muscles on coronal planes were calculated respectively. Logistic regression models based on areas of extraocular muscles were built to diagnose GO. The DL models named ResNet101 and Swin Transformer with T1-weighted MRI without contrast as input were used to diagnose GO and the results were compared to the radiologist's diagnosis only relying on MRI T1-weighted scans. Results: Areas on the coronal plane of each muscle in the GO group were significantly greater than those in the normal group. In the validation group, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of logistic regression models by superior, inferior, medial, and lateral rectus muscles and all muscles were 0.897 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.833-0.949], 0.705 (95% CI: 0.598-0.804), 0.799 (95% CI: 0.712-0.876), 0.681 (95% CI: 0.567-0.776), and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.843-0.955). ResNet101 and Swin Transformer achieved AUCs of 0.986 (95% CI: 0.977-0.994) and 0.936 (95% CI: 0.912-0.957), respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ResNet101 were 0.933, 0.979, and 0.869, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of Swin Transformer were 0.851, 0.817, and 0.898, respectively. The ResNet101 model yielded higher AUC than models of all muscles and radiologists (0.986 Conclusions: The DL models based on MRI T1-weighted scans could accurately diagnose GO, and the application of DL systems in MRI may improve radiologists' performance in diagnosing GO and early detection.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)extraocular musclesGraves ophthalmopathymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID39022293
PMCPMC11250345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.