ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Prediction of metastases in confusing mediastinal lymph nodes based on flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics for Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patient management and prognosis, accurate assessment of mediastinal lymph node (LN) status is essential. This study aimed to use machine learning approaches to assess the status of confusing LNs in the mediastinum using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images; the results were then compared with the diagnostic conclusions of nuclear medicine physicians. Methods: A total of 509 confusing mediastinal LNs that had undergone pathological assessment or follow-up from 320 patients from three centres were retrospectively included in the study. LNs from centres I and II were randomised into a training cohort (N=324) and an internal validation cohort (N=81), while those from centre III patients formed an external validation cohort (N=104). Various parameters measured from PET and CT images and extracted radiomics and deep learning features were used to construct PET/CT-parameter, radiomics, and deep learning models, respectively. Model performance was compared with the diagnostic results of nuclear medicine physicians using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The coupled model of gradient boosting decision tree-logistic regression (GBDT-LR) incorporating radiomic features showed AUCs of 92.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.890-0.953], 84.6% (95% CI, 0.761-0.930) and 84.6% (95% CI, 0.770-0.922) across the three cohorts. It significantly outperformed the deep learning model, the parametric PET/CT model and the physician's diagnosis. DCA demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the GBDT-LR model. Conclusions: The presented GBDT-LR model performed well in evaluating confusing mediastinal LNs in both internal and external validation sets. It not only crossed radiometric features but also avoided overfitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.