ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal feasibility evaluation of SAM-Med3D for cervical cancer clinical target volume segmentation on planning computed tomography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Adapting DeepLabV3+ for biopsy cervical cancer lesion segmentation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Multi-plane attention guided 3D nnU-Net for MRI-based cervical cancer segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- SegResDeiT: a hybrid SegNet-ResNet-50-DeiT framework for automated cervical cancer segmentation and classification.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Large-scale convolutional neural network for clinical target and multi-organ segmentation in gynecologic brachytherapy via multi-stage learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- MVT-Net: A novel cervical tumour segmentation using multi-view feature transfer learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- A literature review of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical image segmentation: from AI and explainable AI to trustworthy AI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- A single-pixel and non-redundant branching-based algorithm for nailfold capillary skeleton line extraction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Cervical cancer clinical target volume (CTV) outlining and organs at risk segmentation are crucial steps in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer. Manual segmentation is inefficient and subjective, leading to the development of automated or semi-automated methods. However, limitation of image quality, organ motion, and individual differences still pose significant challenges. Apart from numbers of studies on the medical images' segmentation, a comprehensive review within the field is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively review the literatures on different types of medical image segmentation regarding cervical cancer and discuss the current level and challenges in segmentation process. Methods: As of May 31, 2023, we conducted a comprehensive literature search on Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science using the following term combinations: "cervical cancer images", "segmentation", and "outline". The included studies focused on the segmentation of cervical cancer utilizing computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission tomography (PET) images, with screening for eligibility by two independent investigators. Key Content and Findings: This paper reviews representative papers on CTV and organs at risk segmentation in cervical cancer and classifies the methods into three categories based on image modalities. The traditional or deep learning methods are comprehensively described. The similarities and differences of related methods are analyzed, and their advantages and limitations are discussed in-depth. We have also included experimental results by using our private datasets to verify the performance of selected methods. The results indicate that the residual module and squeeze-and-excitation blocks module can significantly improve the performance of the model. Additionally, the segmentation method based on improved level set demonstrates better segmentation accuracy than other methods. Conclusions: The paper provides valuable insights into the current state-of-the-art in cervical cancer CTV outlining and organs at risk segmentation, highlighting areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.