Quantification of volumetric thigh and paravertebral muscle fat content: comparison of quantitative Dixon (Q-Dixon) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high-speed T

Background: Muscle fat infiltration (MFI) is increasingly recognized as a critical factor influencing muscle function and metabolic health. Accurate quantification of MFI is essential for diagnosing and monitoring various muscular and metabolic disorders. Quantitative Dixon (Q-Dixon) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-speed T Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 54 subjects [mean age, 60 years; 38 male (M)/16 female (F)] for thigh muscle and 56 subjects (mean age, 50 years; 22 M/34 F) for paravertebral muscle assessment using a 3-Tesla MRI. The proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was measured with Q-Dixon MRI and HISTO MRS within the upper-middle part of quadriceps femoris and paravertebral muscles at L4/5 level in volumes-of-interest (VOIs). The corresponding volumetric Q-Dixon freehand VOI PDFF was measured. Scatterplots, Bland-Altman plots, Spearman correlation coefficients, and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction were employed. The Kruskal-Wallis Results: Q-Dixon cubic VOI PDFF correlated positively with HISTO MRS PDFF in thigh (r=0.96, P<0.001) and paravertebral groups (r=0.98, P<0.001), with insignificant differences (P=0.29, 0.82, respectively). Both PDFF values from cubic VOIs in Q-Dixon and HISTO MRS differed from the freehand Q-Dixon PDFF (all P<0.001). Only for <5% HISTO MRS PDFF, there was a difference between HISTO MRS PDFF and Q-Dixon cubic VOI PDFF (P=0.002). Conclusions: Volumetric Q-Dixon cubic VOI PDFF exhibited good correlation and consistency with HISTO MRS PDFF for quantitative fat assessment in thigh and paravertebral muscles except for muscles with fat fraction <5%, and the Q-Dixon freehand VOI PDFF offers a more comprehensive assessment of the actual MFI compared to cubic VOI.