ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Using four-point subcutaneous injection of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound to diagnose lymphedema of lower extremity.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Lymphatic Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Preoperative Localization in Stage 2-3 Lymphedema: A Feasibility Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- [Research progress of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in treatment of secondary lymphedema].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of lymphedema primarily relies on the clinical symptoms, signs, medical history and imaging. Objective lymphatic imaging helps improving the diagnosis of lymphedema. This study aimed to develop an effective imaging tool to diagnose lymphedema. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study. From September 2022 to November 2023, we enrolled thirty-two patients, involving 40 lower extremities who underwent lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) following a subcutaneous injection of contrast agent at four points in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Cohen's kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Lymphoscintigraphy was the reference standard. Results: Successful lymphatic-CEUS detection was defined as the situation that lymphatic drainage of medial or lateral lower limbs were observed. The successful detection rate was 100% (40 of 40). The diagnosis of lymphedema was based on the presence of either medial or lateral lymphatic obstructions, or subcutaneous lymphatic enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for diagnosing lymphedema by lymphatic-CEUS were as follows: 91.2% (31 of 34), 100% (6 of 6), 100% (31 of 31), 66.7% (6 of 9) and 92.5% (37 of 40), respectively. The Cohen's Kappa value was 0.756. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the subcutaneous injection of four-point lymphatic-CEUS was 0.956. Conclusions: This study put forward a novel four-point lymphatic-CEUS method to detect the functions of the lymphatics of lower extremities and established a lymphatic-CEUS standard for diagnosing lymphedema of lower extremities. Four-point lymphatic-CEUS is a considerable option for diagnosing lymphedema of lower extremities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.