Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022227›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Enhancing automatic prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with deep transfer learning 2.5-dimensional segmentation on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI).

Mengjuan Li, Ning Ding, Shengnan Yin, Yan Lu, Yiding Ji, Long Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengjuan Li *Department of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ning Ding *Department of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shengnan YinDepartment of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yan LuDepartment of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yiding JiDepartment of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Long JinDepartment of Radiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial in determining treatment method. The purpose of this study was to establish a 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep transfer learning (DTL) detection model for the automatic detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI). Methods: A total of 231 patients, including 181 with csPCa and 50 with non-clinically significant PCa (non-csPCa), were enrolled. Stratified random sampling was then employed to divide all participants into a training set [185] and a test set [46]. The DTL model was obtained through image acquisition, image segmentation, and model construction. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the 2.5D and 2-dimensional (2D) models in predicting the aggressiveness of PCa was evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: DTL models based on 2D and 2.5D segmentation were established and validated to assess the aggressiveness of PCa. The results demonstrated that the diagnostic efficiency of the DTL model based on 2.5D was superior to that of the 2D model, regardless of whether in a single or combined sequence. Particularly, the 2.5D combined model outperformed other models in differentiating csPCa from non-csPCa. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the 2.5D combined model in the training and test sets were 0.960 and 0.949, respectively. Furthermore, the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) model showed superiority over the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model, but was not as effective as the combined model, whether based on 2.5D or 2D. Conclusions: A DTL model based on 2.5D segmentation was developed to automatically evaluate PCa aggressiveness on bp-MRI, improving the diagnostic performance of the 2D model. The results indicated that the continuous information between adjacent layers can enhance the detection rate of lesions and reduce the misjudgment rate based on the DTL model.

Indexed as

classificationDeep learning (DL)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)prostate cancer (PCa)

Identifiers

PMID39022227
PMCPMC11250323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.