Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39022066›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Explosive utilization efficiency enhancement: An application of machine learning for powder factor prediction using critical rock characteristics.

Blessing Olamide Taiwo, Angesom Gebretsadik, Hawraa H Abbas, Mohammad Khishe, Yewuhalashet Fissha, Esma Kahraman, Ahsan Rabbani, Adams Abiodun Akinlabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blessing Olamide TaiwoDepartment of Mining Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.
Angesom GebretsadikDepartment of Resources Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Division of Sustainable Resources Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 001-0015, Japan.
Hawraa H AbbasCollege of Information Technology Engineering, Al-Zahraa University for Women, 56001, Karbala, Iraq.
Mohammad KhisheDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Naval Science University of Nowshahr, Nowshahr, Iran.
Yewuhalashet FisshaDepartment of Mining Engineering, Aksum University, 7080, Aksum, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Esma KahramanDepartment of Mining Engineering, Cukurova University, Adana, 01250, Turkey.
Ahsan RabbaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, India.
Adams Abiodun AkinlabiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximizing the use of explosives is crucial for optimizing blasting operations, significantly influencing productivity and cost-effectiveness in mining activities. This work explores the incorporation of machine learning methods to predict powder factor, a crucial measure for assessing the effectiveness of explosive deployment, using important rock characteristics. The goal is to enhance the accuracy of powder factor prediction by employing machine learning methods, namely decision tree models and artificial neural networks. The analysis finds key rock factors that have a substantial impact on the powder factor, hence enabling more accurate planning and execution of blasting operations. The analysis uses data from 180 blast rounds carried out at a dolomite mine in south-south Nigeria. It incorporates measures such as root mean square error (RSME), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R

Indexed as

ExplosiveMachine learningMiningPowder factorSmall scale mine

Identifiers

PMID39022066
PMCPMC11252775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.