ArticleHeliyon2024
Genetic landscape for majority and minority HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in antiretroviral therapy naive patients in Accra, Ghana.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic diversity and drug resistance mutations of HIV-1 in Ghana: a systematic review of two decades.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of a HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping method based on high-throughput sequencing (HTS).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The successful detection of drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in HIV-1 infected patients has improved the management of HIV infection. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect low-frequency mutations is predicted to be useful for efficiently testing minority drug resistance mutations, which could contribute to virological failure. This study employed Sanger sequencing and NGS to detect and compare minority and majority drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 strains in treatment-naive patients from Ghana. Method: From a previous study, 20 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants were selected for a cross-sectional study. Sanger sequencing and NGS techniques were used to detect the majority and minority HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations, respectively, in the protease (PR) and partial reverse transcriptase (RT) genes. NGS detected mutations at 1 % and 5 % frequencies and Sanger sequencing at ≥20 % frequencies. The sequences obtained from NGS and Sanger sequencing platforms were submitted to the Stanford HIV drug resistance database for subtyping, mutation identification, and interpretations. Results: Sequences from the twenty participants where the CRF02_AG was the predominant strain (16, 80 %) were analyzed. NGS detected 25 mutations in the RT and PR genes, compared to 21 mutations by Sanger sequencing. Minority DRMs were detected at the prevalence of 55.0 % with NGS against 35 % DRMs by Sanger sequencing. One of the patients had eight different HIVDR variants, with two minority variants. These mutations were directed against PI (K20I and D30DN), NNRTI (Y181C, M23LM and V108I) and NRTI (K65R, M184I, and D67N). Conclusion: The study affirms the usefulness of genomic sequencing for drug resistance testing in HIV. It further shows that Sanger sequencing alone may not be adequate to detect mutations and that NGS capacity should be developed and deployed in the Ghanaian clinical settings for patients living with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.