ArticleHeliyon2024
Subjective memory concerns and car collisions: A cross-sectional cohort study among older Japanese drivers.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A previous study suggested older drivers with subjective memory concerns (SMC) had increased odds of experiencing car collisions, but whether SMC in different contexts and the number of SMC applicable items change this association is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between SMC and car collisions among older drivers in Japan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a Japanese community-based cohort study. Participants were community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years. SMC was assessed using five questions: 1) "Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?" 2) "Do you have any difficulty with your memory?" 3) "Do you forget where you have left things more than you used to?" 4) "Do you forget the names of close friends or relatives?" and 5) "Do other people find you forgetful?" Participants were asked about their experiences with car collisions during the previous two years. Results: A total of 13,137 older drivers (72.1 ± 5.5 years old, and 43.6 % female) were analyzed. Cochran-Armitage trend test showed that as the number of SMC applicable items increased, the percentage of the experiences of car collisions significantly increased (6.8 %-15.8 %, P < 0.001). Logistic regression models showed each SMC question was associated with an increased odds ratio (OR) of car collisions (OR 1.26 to 1.71, all P < 0.001) after adjusting for confounding factors. As the number of SMC applicable items increased, the OR of car collisions significantly increased (OR 1.19 to 2.28, all P < 0.05, P for trend <0.001). Conclusions: This cross-sectional study among community-dwelling older drivers in Japan suggested each SMC question and the number of applicable items were associated with car collisions. SMC may be a sign of increased risk of traffic incidents for older drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.