ReviewHeliyon2024
A systematic review of cyclonic disaster: Damage-loss, consequences, adaptation strategies, and future scopes.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tropical cyclones have direct and indirect repercussions in many coastal areas worldwide. In coastal regions, several studies have identified the driving factors of cyclonic hazards and their associated impacts. However, previous studies have focused little on cyclone-induced damage and loss, consequences, and adaptation strategies. As a result, it is critical to explore the global focus areas of cyclone-related studies. This review systematically examined cyclone-induced damage and loss, its consequences, adaptation strategies in coastal regions, and associated research gaps. Results revealed eight main types of cyclone-induced damages and losses. About 46 % of studies focused on vegetation damages, followed by water and sanitation (11 %), crop damages (8 %), income or business losses (8 %), health and injuries (8 %), land use and land cover changes (8 %), infrastructural damages (5 %), and mixed damages and losses (5 %). These damages and losses led to further consequences, including disruption of biocenoses, fish death because defoliated leaves carried carbon into the water, changes in forest structure and composition, loss of timber plantation confidence, hampering the steady supply of safe drinking water, raising drinking water costs, unsanitary circumstances, an increase in infectious diseases, a decrease in protein consumption, and business and supply chain interruptions. Approximately 35 % of the studies addressed one or more of the thirteen adaptation strategies identified in this review. Most of these studies documented the use of natural regeneration and tree planting as responses to vegetation damage and water purification and the distribution of emergency-safe water in response to water and sanitation damage. The findings have led to a proposal for an adaptation framework for cyclone-induced damage and loss. This review recommended investigating cyclone-induced land use and land cover change, damage to vegetation functional traits and patterns, health and injuries, service networks, and infrastructural damages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.