ArticleHeliyon2024
The role of mGovernment applications in building trust during public crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, China effectively contained the virus, resulting in increased public trust in the government. Mobile government (mGovernment) applications (apps) played a critical role in this improvement. This study aims to examine how mGovernment apps build citizens' trust in governments during public crises. The DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) is used to evaluate the quality of these apps. Public satisfaction serves as an intermediary variable, while public awareness of epidemic risks in sudden public relations crises acts as a moderating variable to explore the impact of mGovernment apps on government trust. Data analysis is conducted using SPSS Statistics 22.0 and AMOS 21.0. The study's results show that the system quality, information quality, and service quality of mobile government apps influence citizens' trust in governments through the mediating effect of public satisfaction. All three factors positively correlate with public satisfaction, with service quality having the greatest impact. Similarly, system quality, information quality, and service quality are positively correlated with public trust in governments, with system quality having the most noticeable influence. There is a strong correlation between public satisfaction and trust in governments, and the mediating effect of public satisfaction is significant. In addition, epidemic risk perception moderates the relationship between public satisfaction and citizens' trust in governments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.